Evaluation and results
Key performance indicators include patient centred (qualitative, PROMs), Quantitative (functional outcome measures (WHODAS 2.0); disability free survival, morbidity, mortality, PRECALL/MET last 48 hours and discharge destination) and HHS centred (resource utilisation (LOS, throughput) and complication rates.
Lessons learnt
- Having realistic timeframes.
- Continuous engagement of staff.
- Understanding limitations and where to seek help.
- Seeking feedback.
- Test and trial.
References
Dodds C, et al. Peri-operative care of elderly patients – an urgent need for change: a consensus statement to provide guidance for specialist and non-specialist anaesthetists. Perioperative Medicine 2013, 2:6
The elderly surgical patient demands the highest level of care throughout their pathway from consideration of a surgical opinion to returning to their home. This can only be delivered if significant changes are made as a matter of urgency. These changes include:
* The development of ‘fitness to referral’ pathways in primary care
* Effective individualised pre-operative assessment and optimization
* Tailored surgical management to the overall clinical and functional state of the patient
* Discharge planning, across teams, which begins on referral and is reviewed during the entire pathway
including return to home.
Harari D, et al. Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery (‘POPS’): Designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients. Age and Ageing 2007; 36: 190–196
Pre/post comparison in elective orthopaedic patients showed improved post-operative outcomes indicative of better clinical effectiveness and efficiency, and contributed to the service obtaining mainstream funding.
Epstein N. Multidisciplinary in‑hospital teams improve patient outcomes: A review. SNI: Spine 2014; 5(S7):195-303.
Acting like “well‑oiled machines,” multidisciplinary in‑hospital teams include “staff” from different levels of the treatment pyramid (e.g. staff including nurses’ aids, surgical technicians, nurses, anesthesiologists, attending physicians, and others). Their enhanced teamwork counters the “silo effect” by enhancing communication between the different levels of healthcare workers and thus
reduces AE (e.g. morbidity/mortality) while improving patient and healthcare worker satisfaction.
Story D, et al. Complications and mortality in older surgical patients in Australia and New Zealand (the REASON study): a multicentre, prospective, observational study. Anaesthesia, 2010, 65, pages 1022–1030.
20% patients aged over 70 years had postoperative complications within 5 days of surgery, with an increased odds ratio for mortality with implications on length of stay (mean 30 days in non-survivors vs 6 days in survivors)
Shulman M, et al. Measurement of Disability-free Survival after Surgery. Anesthesiology 2015; 122(3):524-536.
Development of new disability (WHODAS>25 or increased by 8) postoperatively resulted in a higher complication rate (20% vs 11%) and increased hospital stay (mean 6.9 vs 5.3 day
Further Reading
QFIRST crowned top innovation at the Health Roundtable
Resources
Public resources
QFIRST Presentation [PDF 1102.54 KB]
QFIRST Clinical Workflow [PDF 254.2 KB]