Evaluation and results
The project was evaluated using a mixed methods approach consisting of analysing patient journey data, supplemented with qualitative data obtained through focus groups and semi-structured interviews with a sample of referring clinicians, participating MDT clinicians, project staff and past patients.
Over an 18-month implementation period, a total of 121 patients were reviewed across 28 MDT meetings. The vast majority of referrals were generated from Mater Public Hospital (76), with 31 referrals coming from Hospital and Health Services (HHSs) across Queensland. Referrals from non-Mater sites increased over the duration of the project. Just over half of all referrals received fell within the intended target population of pre-mastectomy patients, with the remainder referred to the MDT after undergoing mastectomy.
When compared with available data for other public hospitals, patients who were reviewed at the statewide oncoplastics MDT meeting and had a discussion about reconstruction options with their treating doctor were more likely to undergo an oncoplastic or reconstructive procedure, recorded fewer specialist outpatient appointments and waited less time to surgery. Qualitative data received by stakeholders indicated a relatively high level of satisfaction with the design and delivery of the service model, with several opportunities for strengthening the model identified.
References
Online
Cancer Australia - Influencing best practice in breast cancer
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - Breast cancer in Australia
Breast Cancer Network Australia - Breast reconstruction
Cancer Australia - Breast reconstruction
Journal Articles
Javid, S. H., S. O. Lawrence and D. C. Lavallee (2017). "Prioritizing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Surgery Quality Improvement." Breast Journal 23(2): 127-137.
Bauder, A. R., C. P. Gross, B. K. Killelea, P. D. Butler, S. J. Kovach and J. P. Fox (2017). "The Relationship Between Geographic Access to Plastic Surgeons and Breast Reconstruction Rates Among Women Undergoing Mastectomy for Cancer." Ann Plast Surg 78(3): 324-329.
Cheng, H. M., C. McMillan, J. E. Lipa and L. Snell (2017). "A Qualitative Assessment of the Journey to Delayed Breast Reconstruction." Plast Surg (Oakv) 25(3): 157-162.
Young, M. J. and J. Pham (2016). "Improving the electronic nexus between generalists and specialists: A public health imperative?" Healthcare 4(4): 302-306.
Noyes, K., J. R. T. Monson, I. Rizvi, A. Savastano, J. S. A. Green and N. Sevdalis (2016). "Regional Multiteam Systems in Cancer Care Delivery." J Oncol Pract 12(11): 1059-1066.
Vargas, C. R., O. Ganor, M. Semnack, S. J. Lin, A. M. Tobias and B. T. Lee (2015). "Patient preferences in access to breast reconstruction." J Surg Res 195(2): 412-417.
Potter, S., N. Mills, S. Cawthorn, S. Wilson and J. Blazeby (2015). "Exploring information provision in reconstructive breast surgery: A qualitative study." Breast 24(6): 732-738
Liddy, C., A. Afkham, P. Drosinis, J. Joschko and E. Keely (2015). "Impact of and Satisfaction with a New eConsult Service: A Mixed Methods Study of Primary Care Providers." J Am Board Fam Med 28(3): 394-403
Causarano, N., J. Platt, N. N. Baxter, S. Bagher, J. M. Jones, K. A. Metcalfe, S. O. Hofer, A. C. O'Neill, T. Cheng, E. Starenkyj and T. Zhong (2015). "Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial." Support Care Cancer 23(5): 1365-1375.
Further Reading
Mater Health Online News - New model of care for breast cancer streamlines patient pathway