Methods
The project proceeded in four phases: 1) identification of learning needs, 2) development of course content, 3) course building, and 4) course evaluation and publishing. The project was approved by the Children's Health Queensland (CHQ) Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/22/QCHQ/89515) and funded by the CHQ Study, Education and Research Trust Account funding scheme grant.
Phase 1: Identifying learning needs. Perspectives on learning needs were investigated using online student and audiologist focus group interviews (FGIs). Student FGIs, conducted as part of a student-led sub-project, were moderated by two students supervised by audiologists. Audiologist FGIs were moderated by two clinicians. Questions were focused on the level of preparation for and confidence in hearing assessment in young children, including test procedures, problem solving, and clinical reasoning. The audiologist FGI also included questions on interprofessional collaborator learning needs. Session recordings were transcribed, and the data were analysed using the inductive techniques of qualitative description and thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006) to inform the course content and format recommendations.
Phase 2: Developing course content. The course content and format for the two courses were developed based on the recommendations formulated in Phase 1, as well as a review of the current research literature, key textbooks and best practice guidelines, combined with clinical knowledge and experience.
Phase 3: Building the courses. Filming with children/caregivers and audiologists, script recording, video editing and production were completed. The courses were built in the online platform iLearn. The videos were initially embedded in iLearn; however, following the identification of issues with this method in the evaluation phase, links were created to videos housed securely on the CHQ Vimeo site. An engaging format was used in all videos incorporating a range of learning formats including theory slides on the clinical procedures with referencing and scripts for voice over, clinician role play, clinical videos with clinician commentary, clinician discussions with tips, and learning reflections (as determined in Phase 1). Strategies were developed and actioned to ensure privacy of video participants and a focus on person-centred care was maintained throughout all course content.
Phase 4: Evaluating and publishing the courses. The courses were evaluated by audiologists and students for the audiology learner course and audiologists and interprofessional collaborators for the interprofessional learner course. Surveys consisted of a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) to assess the effectiveness of the content and format, video streaming, accessibility, and overall value.
There were also two open-ended questions (What did you like most about the course? Do you have any suggested changes?). Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and recommendations developed to optimise the courses, which were then published on iLearn. The published courses include a feedback form to enable continuous quality improvement.