Learning Curve of Coronary Intravascular Ultrasound

Overview

Initiative type

Service Improvement

Status

Deliver

Published

June 2026

Summary

The learning curve for coronary Intra Vascular Ultrasound has not been previously analysed. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) among multidisciplinary cardiac catheterization laboratory staff.

Dates: Oct 2024 - April 2025

Implementation sites: Ipswich Hospital

Partnerships: Ipswich Heart Foundation - sponsored for the study

Aim

To evaluate the learning curve for coronary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) among multidisciplinary cardiac catheterisation laboratory staffs.

Outcomes

Regular application of IVUS accelerated the learning process among the staffs. IVUS catheter setup time reduced from an average of 7.9 minutes during the first 10 cases to 3.9 minutes during the last 10, indicating improved procedural efficiency. Interpretation skills improved in interventional cardiologists and cardiac physiologists after approximately 15 cases, while nurses’ confidence in IVUS setup improved after about 10 cases. Staff attitudes toward IVUS became more positive over the study period. At the end of study, most reported no discouragement from IVUS use.

Background

Despite international guidelines giving intravascular imaging (IVI) a Class I recommendation,  its global uptake remains suboptimal due to lack of formal training, confidence, and standardized education frameworks. This challenge is also compounded by the dynamic nature of catheterization laboratory procedures, which require quick online and real-time  interpretations. On the other side intravascular imaging becoming mandatory in complex lesions, for optimal stent results. The learning curve for coronary IVI has not been previously analysed. Understanding this learning curve could inform staff training policies  and protocols.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study to assess learning curve in our Cath lab involving  four interventional cardiologists, seven nurses, six radiographers, and three cardiac physiologists. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or left main assessment between October 2024 and April 2025 were recruited.  Patients who declined consent forms and anatomy not suitable for IVUS were excluded from the study.

The procedure details, IVUS set up time were recorded for all the cases. Staff completed structured surveys assessing knowledge, confidence, and attitudes toward  IVUS at baseline, mid-study (after 25 cases), and at study completion. The results were analysed to assess staff performance improvement and change in perception towards IVUS.

Discussion

Among the 50 cases, pre-procedural IVUS was performed in 30%, post-procedure in 37%,  and both pre- and post-procedure in 29%. Diagnostic-only IVUS occurred in 4% of cases, and 48% of PCI performed for acute coronary syndrome.

Procedural efficiency: IVUS catheter setup time reduced from an average of 7.9 minutes during the first 10 cases
to 3.9 minutes during the last 10, indicating improved procedural efficiency (Figure 1A). The mean IVUS Catheter set up time was 5.2 +/-2.5 mins.

Confidence: Interpretation skills improved in interventional cardiologists and cardiac physiologists after approximately
15 cases, while nurses’ confidence in IVUS setup improved after about 10 cases.

Knowledge: Overall staff knowledge improved significantly from baseline to mid-study (p = 0.022) and baseline to final survey (p = 0.032).

Attitudes: Staff attitudes toward  IVUS became more positive over the study period. At the end of study, most reported no discouragement from IVUS use. The expected additional time for PCI with IVUS use was perceived as 10–20 minutes. The strong barrier for IVUS was reported as lack of knowledge  which leads to increased procedural time. We also observed while comparing mid to final survey results, the results were plateaued after 25 cases.

Limitations: This single-centre study involved tertiary-level staff in a government-funded hospital; results
may not generalize globally. The small sample size, lack of core laboratory validation, and distributed operator experience may have diluted learning effects.

Conclusion: There is evidence of learning curve that the regular application of intravascular  ultrasound (IVUS) significantly accelerates procedural efficiency among multidisciplinary catheterization laboratory personnel. To optimize accurate interpretation a structured IVUS training curriculum or central core lab support would be recommended.

References

1) Alexander G. Truesdell, Mirvat A. Alasnag, Prashant Kaul, Syed Tanveer Rab, Robert  F. Riley, Michael N. Young, Wayne B. Batchelor, Akiko Maehara, Frederick G. Welt, Ajay J. Kirtane, Intravascular Imaging During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: JACC State-of-the-Art Review, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Volume 81, Issue   6,2023,Pages 590-605,ISSN 0735-1097,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.045.

2) Connie N. Hess, MD, MHS1, Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH1, Megan L. Neely, PhD1, David Dai,PhD1, William B. Hillegass, MD2, Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD1, Michael A. Kutcher, MD3, John  C. Messenger, MD4, Samir Pancholy, MD, Robert N. Piana, MD5, and Sunil V. Rao, MD1 The Learning Curve for Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention among Operators in the United States: A Study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Circulation.  2014 June 3; 129(22): 2277–2286. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006356.

3) Javier Escaned, MD, PhD a,†,*, Marco Lombardi, MDa,b,†, Matthias G€otberg, MD, PhD c, Nicolas Amabile, MD, PhD d, Adrian Banning, MD, PhD e, Emanuele Barbato, MD, PhD f, Salvatore Brugaletta,  MD, PhD g, Shao-Liang Chen, MD, PhD h, Darshan Doshi, MDi, Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD j, Ken Kozuma, MD, PhD k, Kalaivani Mahadevan, MDl,

4).Dejan Milasinovic, MD, PhD m, Jan-Malte Sinning, MD, PhD n, Gabor Toth, MD, PhD o, Nieves Gonzalo, MD, PhD a, Mamas A. Mamas,
MD, PhD p, Ajay J. Kirtane, MD, SMq, r Factors Contributing to Low Utilization of Intracoronary Imaging in Clinical Practice: A White Paper

5.)ot J. Stein Stephen W. Waldo , MD, MSTR; Elise Mesenbring, MS; Tracy Smith, MS; Annika Hebbe , MS; Taufiq Salahuddin , MD; Michael D. Dyal, MD; Jacob A. Doll , MD. Intravascular Imaging as a Performance Measure for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025;18:e014528. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014528

Key contact

Dr Yohan Chacko

Interventional Cardiologist

Ipswich Hospital

Email: yohan.chacko@health.qld.gov.au